it's also not acceptable that the job a child's father has, and the question whether this child has German parents or not, is basis for the decision of which school to put the child in
Whoa! What? That seems kinda blatant. Which school how?
I wonder what these inclusion issues are like in America. Probably not great although I know some kids with disabilities had an individual "assistant" sort of person. Or there were special ed classes within the school. . . I don't really know anything about it, though, and I come from a moderately wealthy area.
I think it's smart to focus on the smaller stuff. A lot of it is like focused versions of the big isms - (2) is about ablism, (3) is about concerns about corporations (ok, not an ism, but I think of it like one) and who our economies really help, and also health issues! ((1) is obvious!) So breaking it down into one issue that you can focus on and change seems smart! Much more practical and effective.
edit: Also! Thank you for responding! My answer is so short. XD But you know, it's cos I pretty much just agree with you!
Re: Part 2!
Whoa! What? That seems kinda blatant. Which school how?
I wonder what these inclusion issues are like in America. Probably not great although I know some kids with disabilities had an individual "assistant" sort of person. Or there were special ed classes within the school. . . I don't really know anything about it, though, and I come from a moderately wealthy area.
I think it's smart to focus on the smaller stuff. A lot of it is like focused versions of the big isms - (2) is about ablism, (3) is about concerns about corporations (ok, not an ism, but I think of it like one) and who our economies really help, and also health issues! ((1) is obvious!) So breaking it down into one issue that you can focus on and change seems smart! Much more practical and effective.
edit: Also! Thank you for responding! My answer is so short. XD But you know, it's cos I pretty much just agree with you!